Thursday 6 September 2012

What does the second cat symbolize?

I think it is possible
to read the second cat as symbolic of the narrator's guilt. After he maims and murders Pluto,
the first black cat, he says that "there came back into my spirit a half-sentiment that
seemed, but was not, remorse." He says that it is not quite remorse, but he does begin to
"look about [himself]" to find another cat, the same in appearance, to replace the
first. The narrator likes the new cat at first, but he gradually comes to "dislike"
it, and then it soon "disgusted and annoyed" him, and then he eventually grows to feel
the "bitterness of hatred" for the cat. He fails to abuse it out of "shame, and
the remembrance of [his] former deed" (murdering Pluto), and this sounds a great deal like
guilt. The narrator's sense of guilt is vague at firsthard for him even to namebut it grows and
begins to determine his behavior toward the cat. He admits that he "longed to destroy
it" but holds back "partly by a memory of [his] former crime, but chiefly . . . by
absolute dread of the beast." There is no reason to "dread"
this cat if not for the feelings with which the narrator associates it; the cat seems to love
him and is very affectionate. Perhaps the narrator dreads the cat because of what the cat
represents, his own guilty conscience.

As his guilt seems to come into
sharper focus, so does the noose of white fur on the new cat's breast. The narrator seems to
feel guilty about hanging Pluto, and so the new cat now begins to manifest that guilt
physically. The narrator feels that this "brute beast" is causing
him "insufferable woe," butagain, the cat itself does nothing to
cause this feeling, but the narrator's own guilty conscience, which he seems unable to
recognize, could cause it. He says that he feels this woe to be "incumbent eternally upon
[his] heart," strengthening the argument that it is guilt he feels, as
this would weigh heavily upon him.

After the narrator murders his wife, a
crime he calls "hideous" (an acknowledgement that seems to imply guilt), he hides her
corpse in the wall, and he is relieved to see that the cat seems to have disappeared as well. He
feels like he has gotten away with his crime, and he says that he
"slept [tranquilly] even with the burden of murder upon [his]
soul." With the cat gone, he seems to believe that he has escaped his guilty conscience,
even saying that his "happiness was supreme!" and that "The guilt of [his] dark
deed disturbed [him] but little"though it does disturb him.
 

Finally, the police come and search his home, andfinding nothing
suspiciousthey begin to take their leave. However, the narrator, inexplicably, feels a
"rabid desire to say something easily" though he "scarcely knew what [he] uttered
at all." The investigators were on their way out, and the narrator would have been home
free if he would have kept his mouth shut, but he could not. He blathers on about the
construction of the house, even striking the wall with his cane, and just as he could not keep
his own mouth shut, the cat begins to "scream" and "howl" from behind the
wall, giving the murderer away. The narrator's guilt compelled him to speak up just as he was
about to get away with his crime, prompting the cat to "speak" too, symbolically
linking the narrator's guilt with the second cat.

No comments:

Post a Comment

To what degree were the U.S., Great Britain, Germany, the USSR, and Japan successful in regards to their efforts in economic mobilization during the...

This is an enormous question that can't really be answered fully in this small space. But a few generalizations can be made. Bo...