Tuesday, 17 April 2012

What are the pros and cons of electing judges?

Pros:

  • Electing judges results in a judiciary that is
    more responsive to public concerns, less out of touch with what the people want. It's all too
    easy for an unelected judiciary to lose sight of what's in the best interests of the community
    as a whole and serve its own narrow interests.
  • Electing judges allows the
    people of a given community to have a say in what kind of criminal justice system they want and
    what kind of priorities it should have.

Cons:


  • Electing judges undermines the rule of law. Legal cases should be decided
    on legal principles, not according to what's popular with the voters.

  • Judges are there to interpret and apply the law; that's their job. Unlike elected
    politicians, they are not there to serve the interests of the people directly. They do so
    indirectly through a fair and consistent application of the law.

No comments:

Post a Comment

To what degree were the U.S., Great Britain, Germany, the USSR, and Japan successful in regards to their efforts in economic mobilization during the...

This is an enormous question that can't really be answered fully in this small space. But a few generalizations can be made. Bo...