Sunday, 14 October 2012

What were some important aspects of domestic affairs during Jefferson's presidency?

 


I must disagree with the above answer; as there were a number of domestic issues during
Jefferson's presidency that were of the utmost concern:

  • There was
    the Essex Junto, a group of radical Federalists who saw the demise of their
    party if the territory gained in the Louisiana Purchase came into the Union. They planned to
    have New England secede from the Union under the leadership of New York. The scheme involved
    having Aaron Burr elected Governor of New York and then have him lead the effort. Alexander
    Hamilton discovered the plot, and exposed it, which ruined Burr's reputation. It was as a result
    of this dispute that Burr challenged Hamilton to a duel in which he killed him.

  • There was the Tertium Quid, a group of radical Republicans who
    opposed any move of Jefferson's which they considered "liberal." They were the first
    of several third party movements in the U.S.; none of which were successful.

  • There was the Burr conspiracy in which Aaron Burr and General James Wilkerson planned
    to have Louisiana secede from the U.S. and form their own Empire. The plot failed, and Burr was
    tried for treason. The trial was presided over by then Chief Justice John Marshall who would do
    anything to embarrass Jefferson. Marshall adopted a strangely strict interpretation of the
    burden of proof for treason which not only resulted in Burr's acquittal, it set a difficult
    precedent for future treason trials. At the same trial, Jefferson refused to honor a subpoena
    from Burr's attorneys, thereby laying the groundwork for executive privilege.

  • There was the Embargo Act, intended to keep America out of the war with France and
    Britain. It ended up ruining the American economy.
  • Most importantly, the
    Supreme Court of Marbury vs. Madison was issued during Jefferson's
    presidency. This all important case established the principal of Judicial Review.

  • Contrary to the position of the earlier post, Jefferson's purchase of Louisiana
    did not result in any great debate over
    Constitutional interpretation. Jefferson construed his power to make treaties in the name of the
    U.S. as sufficient to justify the purchase; a strangely broad construction. He justified his
    actions by writing:

the good sense of our
country will correct the evil of loose construction when it shall produce ill effects.


  • All of this goes without mentioning the efforts of Louis
    and Clark, and the Jefferson's enormous popularity after doubling the size of the U.S.

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

To what degree were the U.S., Great Britain, Germany, the USSR, and Japan successful in regards to their efforts in economic mobilization during the...

This is an enormous question that can't really be answered fully in this small space. But a few generalizations can be made. Bo...