Public
    speaking, like any form of communication, requires certain shared interests between speaker and
    listener. In this particular mode of , several canons are employed when the communication is
    effective and when it leads to actual change in behavior or attitude.
First,
    the effective strategies: (1) the physical attributes of the communication €“ the pleasant and
    appropriately strong or gentle sound of the voice, the appealing appearance of the speaker, the
    ambience orof the venue, etc.-- must all be in place. (2) Next, the opening utterance (in fact,
    even the announced title/subject of the speech) must draw the listener in to the topic. (3)
    After the first arresting, intriguing, challenging statements (not necessarily in declarative
    voice €“ questions, suppositions, etc. often work better), the speaker must present what is
    called the declaration of structure, by which is meant a brief map of how the journey from
    thesis to conclusion will be arranged/designed. This feature, early in the utterance, allows the
    listener to anticipate the arguments structure and therefore to follow the unfolding of the
    evidence. (4) Next, in vocal paragraphs, the public speaker must adhere to the announced
    structure, citing evidence not only authoritatively but convincingly, neither exaggerating nor
    understating the struts that hold up the thesis position. (5) Finally, the speaker must
    summarize the evidence and restate the conclusion in undeniable terms.
    
    Now the errors in public speaking: (1) an unclear, ambiguous stance on the question in
    controversy. If the speaker does not make perfectly clear which side he/she is arguing, the
    audience will mentally retreat from the argument, losing immediate interest in the outcome. (2)
    Second, the speaker should not digress from the point to make jokes or otherwise perform
    himself/herself. (3) Another mistake some speakers make is assuming the audience members are as
    interested in the topic and argument as the speaker. So in order not to lose their attention the
    speaker must reword the thesis statement without altering the intent of the speech. (4)
    Throughout the delivery the speaker must avoid the Manichean fallacy (oversimplifying the debate
    by committing the either-or fallacy). (5) Finally, the public speaker should not malign the
    opposing viewpoint by deriding or otherwise insulting those who hold an opposing
    view.
No comments:
Post a Comment