Thursday 25 March 2010

Why don't the girls have names (Jamaica Kincaid's "Girls")?

's "Girls" is
a very short story. Written using 650 words, no periods, and only one sentence ending
punctuation (the question mark), the story's narrator (a mother) tells her daughter about the
trials and tribulations of being a girl. The "dialogue" contains advice and warnings
by the mother and only two responses by the daughter (one where she denies singing
"benna" on Sundays and, with the second, asks what will happen if the baker does not
let her touch the bread). The mother's conversation limits the daughter's ability to respond,
since she continues to talk throughout the whole of the text (even ignoring what her daughter
does say). 

The names of the girls (mother and daughter) do not matter. This
conversation could be held by, essentially, any mother and daughter. For this reason, the author
seems to refuse to name the characters. By not naming them, readers are able to engage and
understand the conversation in a completely involved way. Some readers may even feel as if it
could be a conversation which could take place between them and their own mothers. It seems as
Kincaid wants readers to feel apart of the text (by not naming the
characters). 

No comments:

Post a Comment

To what degree were the U.S., Great Britain, Germany, the USSR, and Japan successful in regards to their efforts in economic mobilization during the...

This is an enormous question that can't really be answered fully in this small space. But a few generalizations can be made. Bo...