Wednesday, 30 March 2011

Why did ancient Greece advance differently compared to earlier civilizations in Egypt, Mesopotamia, China, and Indus valley?

In a
sense, every civilization is unique, and so all civilizations advance in different manners from
other civilizations. 

The first major Greek-speaking civilization, the
Mycenaean one, was quite similar to neighboring kingdoms of Mesopotamia and Egypt, in being a
monarchy, having a syllabic alphabet, having a polytheistic religion, and developing monumental
architecture. The collapse of Mycenaean civilization led to the formation of a more fissiparous
civilization in classical antiquity.

One distinct feature of Greece is
geography, with small fertile areas divided from each other by mountains that make land travel
difficult. That meant that from an early age, Greek civilization had a maritime orientation.
Also, this geographical setting led to the development of city-states or "poleis" as
integral political units, rather than the creation of vast empires. 

The
Athenian democracy was a direct outgrowth of the small size of the polis. Direct democracy of
the Athenian type would not have been possible in larger states with ancient technology; there
was simply no way a larger nation could fit all its free males into a single assembly space and
have them discuss political measures and vote. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

To what degree were the U.S., Great Britain, Germany, the USSR, and Japan successful in regards to their efforts in economic mobilization during the...

This is an enormous question that can't really be answered fully in this small space. But a few generalizations can be made. Bo...