Diamonds main point is that, while we tend to think of hunting/gathering and farming as an
either/or proposition, in fact the change from one economy to the other happened very slowly.
Another false premiss Diamond discusses is the notion that farming is always better than
hunting/gathering; he shows that in many situations, particularly at the beginning of
agriculture, farming was far more labor intensive, and yielded less food, than
hunting/gathering. He argues that farming was less a choice than a set of practices that
evolved over...
Wednesday, 19 November 2008
In Guns, Germs, and Steel, how does Diamond challenge our assumptions about the transition from hunter gathering to farming?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
To what degree were the U.S., Great Britain, Germany, the USSR, and Japan successful in regards to their efforts in economic mobilization during the...
This is an enormous question that can't really be answered fully in this small space. But a few generalizations can be made. Bo...
-
The love that exists between CÄrudatta and VasantasenÄ is clearly very strong as it endures throughout all manner of trials and tr...
-
We are given only a few glimpses of the lives of inner party members. However, those glimpses show us that this small group of party...
-
Eliza Doolittle undergoes various transformations as she is changed from a poor, Cockney, downtrodden flower girl to a lady who is d...
No comments:
Post a Comment