Diamonds main point is that, while we tend to think of hunting/gathering and farming as an
either/or proposition, in fact the change from one economy to the other happened very slowly.
Another false premiss Diamond discusses is the notion that farming is always better than
hunting/gathering; he shows that in many situations, particularly at the beginning of
agriculture, farming was far more labor intensive, and yielded less food, than
hunting/gathering. He argues that farming was less a choice than a set of practices that
evolved over...
Wednesday, 19 November 2008
In Guns, Germs, and Steel, how does Diamond challenge our assumptions about the transition from hunter gathering to farming?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
To what degree were the U.S., Great Britain, Germany, the USSR, and Japan successful in regards to their efforts in economic mobilization during the...
This is an enormous question that can't really be answered fully in this small space. But a few generalizations can be made. Bo...
-
Poor white Southerners did not have an easy life in the South after the Civil War. A lot of men either did not come back from the w...
-
The forest in represents the place where nature and passion can grow freely and isn't restrained by Puritan ethics. While the P...
-
On the domestic front, the affair leads to a breakdown in trust between Elizabeth and John Proctor. John had always been such a good...
No comments:
Post a Comment