Argue for one side of this point: we should have limits on our freedom.

We
already do have limits on our freedoms in respect of the laws that we are expected to obey.
Legally at least, I don't have the freedom to steal something that belongs to someone else, and
nor do I have the freedom to hit someone if I feel aggrieved. In this sense, legal restrictions
on our freedoms are absolutely necessary for a civil, ordered society that we can all live in
peacefully.

Another restriction on our freedom that is legally enshrined in
most democratic societies is the restriction of our freedom of speech. At first...