A
    literarywithin "" to the story Peter Pan would allude to one or
    more of several things.
- Peter Pan was a playful rascal who never
wanted to grow up. - Peter Pan had a following of similar little boys who
never wanted to grow up. - They lived in a land past the second star on the
right where they had non-stop adventures and outwitted a wily villain: - Tinker Bell was Peter's friend and guide, with her magic pixie dust.
 - Wendy and her brothers were invited to Never Land.
 - She made the
Lost Boys think of home and mother. - Invited to stay in Never Land, Wendy
and her brothers opted to return home. - Peter Pan abandoned his parents for
immortal childhood. - Wendy and her brothers temporarily abandoned their
parents for a short-lived adventure. - The overall tone of this much beloved
tale is lighthearted, fun and loving. - Peter Pan is not perceived as being
unbalanced and spewing hatred and danger. 
"The Veldt"
    shares some things in common, but they are antithetical opposites.
- The overall tone of is menacing, dark, threatening and dangerous.
 - Wendy and Peter have gone past creating charming and over-indulged play scenes and
become absorbed in creating angry, retributive scenes (for revenge and retribution). - Their parents aren't abandoned for immortal youth, but for vicious
retaliation. - Their parents aren't abandoned: they are murdered.
 - Wendy and Peter don't desire playful immortal youth; they desire control and power
manifest through childhood's tools or toys. - Peter and Wendy don't test
their courage and resourcefulness against a wily villain; they antagonize, threaten, imprison
and eliminate their well-meaning, though misguided parents. 
As
    the overall picture of each is set out in detail, one sees how there is similarity, but one more
    readily sees how "The Veldt" is the antithetical dark
    side of the Peter Pan tale. Where Peter Pan is innocently young and
    adventuresome, Wendy and Peter Hadley are cruelly bent upon realizing their own dangerous
    objectives.
So, to defend the idea that "The Veldt" is an allusion
    to Peter Pan one must expand the definition of "allusion" to
    include a negative or antithetical representation of a well know work etc. The current standard
    definition of "allusion" applies to
    those parts that call to mind a direct correspondence to or correlation
    with the work etc alluded to.
title="Allusion. Literary Terms. lilia Melani. Brooklyn College">An
allusion: a brief reference to a person, event, place, or phrase. The writer assumes
[readers] recognize the reference.
To illustrate, if I
    refer to "colored eggs in a basket," the allusion embodied therein calls forth a
    direct recollection of the Easter Bunny. A negative, antithetical
    image of an anti-Bunny who robs colored eggs form baskets is
    not evoked. The only way a negative or
    antithetical understanding might be evoked by an allusion would be if the negative
    aspect were explicitly invoked in the language. For instance, I might say
    "betrayed colored eggs in a basket"; this might call forth the
    antithetical image of a villainous Easter Bunny.
While
    it might be argued that Peter Pan inspired "The Veldt," it cannot
    correctly be said that "The Veldt" alludes to the tale because there is
    no direct correlation between the two--there
    is an antithetical correlation, a light side to dark side, positive to
    negative correlation. One might correctly say that "The Veldt"
    references Peter Pan, since reference may be
    of any sort: a positive reference, a negative one, an inverse reference, an antithetical one, or
    a contrasting one.
No comments:
Post a Comment