Sunday, 26 June 2011

Is Peyton Farquhar an idiot or a hero for what he did in "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge"?

An idiot?
Definitely not. "Foolhardy"? Possibly. A novice in the field of espionage?
Undoubtedly. Farquhar is willing to do anything he can to help the cause of the Confederacy, and
he hopes this spying mission will help him to land a battlefield commission.


... he chafed under the inglorious restraint, longing for the
release of his energies, the larger life of the soldier, the opportunity for distinction. That
opportunity, he felt, would come, as it comes to all in wartime. Meanwhile he did what he could.
No service was too humble for him to perform in the aid of the South, no adventure too perilous
for him to undertake if consistent with the character of a civilian who was at heart a
soldier...

Spying is a dangerous game, and Farquhar's
decision to undertake the burning of the Owl Creek Bridge is not an act of idiocy but one of
bravery. His big mistake was not recognizing that the man dressed in Southern garb who provided
him with the information about the bridge was in fact a Union soldier--also a spy, and probably
a much more experienced one. Farquhar can be blamed for being being gullible and naive, but his
actions were of a heroic nature. If successful, he would have helped to restrict Union movements
in his home state; instead, he will only be remembered for giving his life in the failed
attempt.

href="https://www.owleyes.org/text/occurrence-owl-creek-bridge/read/i">https://www.owleyes.org/text/occurrence-owl-creek-bridge/...

No comments:

Post a Comment

To what degree were the U.S., Great Britain, Germany, the USSR, and Japan successful in regards to their efforts in economic mobilization during the...

This is an enormous question that can't really be answered fully in this small space. But a few generalizations can be made. Bo...