I think it's
intentionally left ambiguous. is simply "not there." There are several places he SAYS
he is afterwards; however, he takes no true active part in the battle. The key thing to note is
that afterwards, he usesas his "propaganda tool" to let the others know of his
influences during the battle. In other words, he was probably hiding or watching, but in no way
to participate. After all, if he was injured, what would the animals do then? It was
essentially his way of manipulating the animals to do as he said and believe what he
wanted.
Friday, 10 July 2009
In the book, Animal Farm, where is Napolean during the battle of Cowshed?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
To what degree were the U.S., Great Britain, Germany, the USSR, and Japan successful in regards to their efforts in economic mobilization during the...
This is an enormous question that can't really be answered fully in this small space. But a few generalizations can be made. Bo...
-
The love that exists between CÄrudatta and VasantasenÄ is clearly very strong as it endures throughout all manner of trials and tr...
-
We are given only a few glimpses of the lives of inner party members. However, those glimpses show us that this small group of party...
-
Eliza Doolittle undergoes various transformations as she is changed from a poor, Cockney, downtrodden flower girl to a lady who is d...
No comments:
Post a Comment