I think it's
    intentionally left ambiguous. is simply "not there."  There are several places he SAYS
    he is afterwards; however, he takes no true active part in the battle.  The key thing to note is
    that afterwards, he usesas his "propaganda tool" to let the others know of his
    influences during the battle.  In other words, he was probably hiding or watching, but in no way
    to participate.  After all, if he was injured, what would the animals do then? It was
    essentially his way of manipulating the animals to do as he said and believe what he
    wanted.
Friday, 10 July 2009
In the book, Animal Farm, where is Napolean during the battle of Cowshed?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
To what degree were the U.S., Great Britain, Germany, the USSR, and Japan successful in regards to their efforts in economic mobilization during the...
This is an enormous question that can't really be answered fully in this small space. But a few generalizations can be made. Bo...
- 
The forest in represents the place where nature and passion can grow freely and isn't restrained by Puritan ethics. While the P...
 - 
On the domestic front, the affair leads to a breakdown in trust between Elizabeth and John Proctor. John had always been such a good...
 - 
Poor white Southerners did not have an easy life in the South after the Civil War. A lot of men either did not come back from the w...
 
No comments:
Post a Comment