I think it's
intentionally left ambiguous. is simply "not there." There are several places he SAYS
he is afterwards; however, he takes no true active part in the battle. The key thing to note is
that afterwards, he usesas his "propaganda tool" to let the others know of his
influences during the battle. In other words, he was probably hiding or watching, but in no way
to participate. After all, if he was injured, what would the animals do then? It was
essentially his way of manipulating the animals to do as he said and believe what he
wanted.
Friday, 10 July 2009
In the book, Animal Farm, where is Napolean during the battle of Cowshed?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
To what degree were the U.S., Great Britain, Germany, the USSR, and Japan successful in regards to their efforts in economic mobilization during the...
This is an enormous question that can't really be answered fully in this small space. But a few generalizations can be made. Bo...
-
Richard Ntiru is an African poet from Uganda in East Africa. There is little biographical information available on Ntiru but critic ...
-
What he's trying to say here is that you shouldn't spend a lot of time trying to think about stuff or whine about stuff, but...
-
Alfred Doolittle is a man changed by wealth at the end of the story. He returns to reflect how money has hurt his lifestyle since hi...
No comments:
Post a Comment